[OmniOS-discuss] On pkg(1) behavior in r151022

Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us
Mon Feb 20 22:46:14 UTC 2017


On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Dan McDonald wrote:
>
> Because of the least-suprise violation of new "pkg update" behavior, 
> I'm wondering if we should make "-r" implicit.  I'm working right 
> now on an implicit "-r" solution, but am running into some problems 
> with the pkg5 test suite I still need to sort out.

I like the new behavior because it provides an option which previously 
did not exist.  It would be cleaner if 'update' also used -r.

The documentation says that the linked zones are updated as required 
such that they still work.

Bob
-- 
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/


More information about the OmniOS-discuss mailing list