<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 14 Feb 2017, at 16.06, Andre Kruger <<a href="mailto:andre@ak47.co.za" class="">andre@ak47.co.za</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">But, on many Windows forums there are warning cloning a HDD directly to an SSD, of the boot drive drive C, and then using the SSD. Apparently many users have experienced very slow performance. You can however clone from HDD to HDD or SSD to SSD without these performance problems. From there my question if anybody knows of a caveat not to do it in this way if I want to clone my rpool from HDD to SSD. If none I would rather walk this path as it is far less trouble.</span></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">I think the slow (write) performance is due to too small block size and write amplification.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">— Jaakko</div></div></div></body></html>