<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<tt>I have not seen yet how much better dedup2 in Solaris is, </tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>but the current Open-ZFS implementation has the following
problems</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>- You must keep the dedup table in any case in RAM as this
is realtime dedup </tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>otherwise a pool import or snapshot delete can last ages
and performance can become unusable slow. </tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>- it requires a lot of RAM that you want to use for caching</tt><tt>
and performance. <br>
</tt><tt>Depending on data we talk about 1-5 GB RAM / TB dedup data</tt><tt>
(that is required additionally to your cache demands). <br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>- while you can enable on a filesystem level it operates on
pool level. </tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>once activated you cannot disable beside a pool destroy. </tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>In the end, it may be a good idea but only when you have
enough RAM and very high dedup rates </tt><tt>(say >5-10) <br>
</tt><tt>that are much better then the compress rate with lz4</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Mostly the dedup rate is not good enough compared to a
larger pool with lz4 dedup </tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>where you do not need to care about the dedup restrictions</tt><tt>.<br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>gea</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>@napp-it.org</tt><tt><br>
</tt><br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 03.05.2018 um 09:22 schrieb Oliver
Weinmann:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:767138E0D064A148B03FE8EC1E9325A20138E4145F@GEDAEVW01.a.space.corp">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I always hear people saying don’t use dedup
with ZFS. Is that still the case? We use omnios as a VEEAM
backup target and I would assume that using dedup would save a
lot of disk space.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best Regards,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Oliver</p>
</div>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="cid:part1.AED58351.DF99A9FD@hfg-gmuend.de" class=""><span><span></span></span></p>
<p><strong><span>Oliver Weinmann</span></strong><br>
Head of Corporate ICT</p>
<p>Telespazio VEGA Deutschland GmbH<br>
Europaplatz 5 - 64293 Darmstadt - Germany <br>
Ph: +49 (0)6151 8257 744 | Fax: +49 (0)6151 8257 799<br>
<a href="mailto:oliver.weinmann@telespazio-vega.de"
moz-do-not-send="true">oliver.weinmann@telespazio-vega.de</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true">www.telespazio-vega.de</a></p>
<p>Registered office/Sitz: Darmstadt, Register
court/Registergericht: Darmstadt, HRB 89231; Managing
Director/Geschäftsführer: Sigmar Keller</p>
<p> </p>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
OmniOS-discuss mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com">OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss">http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>