[OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS and OpenMP

Paul B. Henson henson at acm.org
Tue Jan 5 01:00:55 UTC 2016


Ah, bloating the total package count vs bloating the default installed file system, decisions, decisions :). 

I think on this one I'd vote for a separate package. 

> On Jan 4, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Dan McDonald <danmcd at omniti.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jan 4, 2016, at 4:53 PM, Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote:
>> 
>> While OmniOS observes a 'KYSTY' philosophy, the default created OmniOS zone size still seems rather large.
> 
> That can get fixed once we reform "entire".  I was thinking that if it didn't get included in gcc-5-runtime it'd NOT be in "entire".
> 
>> Avoiding expanding this size should be part of the decision criteria.  Other than that, including it in gcc-5-runtime would make things easier for packagers and avoid additional moving parts.
> 
> And you've illuminated why it's not an obvious decision.  Hence my putting the question out here.
> 
> Dan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OmniOS-discuss mailing list
> OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com
> http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss


More information about the OmniOS-discuss mailing list